Thursday, December 16, 2010

Module#9 Course Design: course syllabus & course cover letter

Cover Letter

Soo Hyun Kim
Ansan- si Gyeonggi-do, Korea .
(070)7760-8087
December 17, 2010

Antoaneta Bonev, Ph.D.
California State University, San Bernardino
5500 University ParkwaySan Bernardino, CA 92374

Course Syllabus
Course Title: Fun and Practical English 101
Instructor: Soo Hyun Kim
E-mail: shkim29@gmail.com
Year: 2011
Grade Level: 9th in EFL
Proficiency Level: Regular (or Intermediate)
Class Meetings: Five times a week
Time: 45-minute sessions
Duration: 1 semester (16 weeks)

Course Description

The purpose of this course is to improve students’ communication skills in English in speaking, listening, and writing their own plays as well as performing them. This will motivate the students to apply what they learn during class to actual usage. After this course, students will be able to express and communicate in various topics and will be able to write and perform according to what they learned during class. This course pursues not only enhancing English proficiency but also helping them to have interest in learning a language and applying them.

Course Outline by Quarters (i.e. quarter of 4 weeks)

1. Practical Communication (listening and grammar with special focus on speaking and writing)
2. Writing
3. Grammar
4. Presentation/Class Play

Standards

TESOL ESL Standards for Pre-K-12 Students: Grades 9-12
http://www.cal.org/resources/archive/langlink/0300.html

Goal 1: To use English to communicate in social settings
Students will:
1. use English to participate in social interaction
2. interact in, through, and with spoken and written English for personal expression and enjoyment
3. use learning strategies to extend their communicative competence

Goal 2: To use English to achieve academically in all content areas
Standards for Goal 2
Students will:
1. use English to interact in the classroom
2. use English to obtain, process, construct, and provide subject matter information in spoken and written form
3. use appropriate learning strategies to construct and apply academic knowledge
.
Goal 3: To use English in socially and culturally appropriate ways Standards for Goal 3
Students will:
1. use the appropriate language variety, register, and genre according to audience, purpose, and setting
2. use nonverbal communication appropriate to audience, purpose, and setting
3. use appropriate learning strategies to extend their sociolinguistic and sociocultural competence
.
Course Objectives

1. Students will use English to communicate in social interaction.
2. Students will speak and write English for personal expression and enjoyment.
3. Students will use learning strategies to extend their communicative competence.
4. Students will use English to interact in the classroom.
5. Students will use English to obtain, process, construct, and provide subject matter information in spoken and written form
6. Students will use appropriate learning strategies to construct and apply academic knowledge
7. Students will use the appropriate language variety, register, and genre according to audience, purpose, and setting.
8. Students will use nonverbal communication appropriate to audience, purpose, and setting.
9. Students will use appropriate learning strategies to extend their sociolinguistic and sociocultural competence

Course Policies

• All cell phones/pagers MUST be turned off during class time.
• Students are expected to attend each class. Daily attendance will be taken and 1 pt is awarded per day of attendance.
• Each student is expected to read assigned material prior to class and participate in class discussions.

Required Texts:

1. Elliott, R. (2006). Painless Grammar.
2. Hanyang University press (2005). Practical English Communication.
3. Haugnes, N. & Maher, B. (2009). NorthStar 2 Reading and Writing.

Grading Policy:

Attendance (1 pt per day) = 80 pts
Quizzes (3 Quizzes per semester x 10 pts) = 30 pts
Test (2 Tests per semester x 30 pts) = 60 pts
Playwright Assignment = 30 pts
Midterm Exam = 50 pts
Final Exam = 100 pts
Final Presentation = 100 pts
Total 450 pts
* Grades will be given according to the following scale:
A 400-450 pts
B 350-399 pts
C 300-349 pts
D 250-299 pts
F below 249 pts

Make up Work Policy

Students’ attendance must be 70% or better in order to successfully pass this course. Students shall be responsible for obtaining and completing make up assignments and tests after absences (with a note from home or from the doctor, i.e. an excused absence). Students shall be permitted to take tests administered in class ONLY due to an excused absence. For missed classes, the teacher may assign the student make-up work when he/she returns to class. All work must be made up within two days after the student returns to class unless other arrangements are made with the teacher.

Course Assessments:• Quizzes (10 points)

There will be a quiz on week #2, #6, and #10. Quizzes will consist of what we have discussed in class as well as the reading assignment.
• Tests (30 points)
There will be a test on week #4 and #12. The tests will be given in a bigger scale than the quizzes and will consist of all our discussions as well as the reading assignment.
• Playwright (30 points)
During the last quarter (from weeks 13-16), students will be asked to write a play together in a group. They will be asked to write their own part first during the first week (week#13) per group and then they are to bring it altogether in order to come up with a one merging play. All student participation is required to earn the appropriate points.
• Final Presentation (100 points)
Students in their groups who have written the play will need to put on the play together as their final presentation. Each student will be evaluated according to their writing and performance individually as well as in their groups. All props, costumes, backdrops, etc., must be in place for the setting of the play.
• Midterm Exam (50 pts) and Final Exam (100 pts)
These exams will be cumulative of all the chapters covered and topics discussed. Midterm exam will consist of all the chapters covered previously and the final exam will consist of all the chapters covered during the entire semester.

Course Tentative Outline


Reading reflection on Grave(#4,8,9)

Conceptulizing Content

You may have experiences of thinking about getting through lessons without thinking about content. The product of conceptualizing content is a kind of syllabus in that it delineates what you will teach. It is still important to go through the process of conceptualizing content so that on the one hand you can understand how the syllabus is constructed, and on the other hand can become aware of your own priorities with respect to your students. One of the question which can guide you to conceptualize content is to figure out who they are, their needs and the purpose of the course. When designing a language course, there are a number of features which you can choose to highlight or to include in your map. You can consider of who your students are, their needs, why they are taking the course, and whether and how the course has been described to students or the public, as well as your own experience and preferences. Choice is a key, because you cannot explicitly focus on or do everything. Conceptualizing content, then, is a matter of articulating what you will explicitly teach. It also involves choosing the organizing principle or principles that will help to tie the content together.

Developing Materials

Materials development is the planning process by which a teacher creates units and lessons within those units to carry out the goals and objectives of the course. It is the process of making your syllabus more specific. When a teacher design a course, materials development means creating, choosing or adapting, and organizing materials and activities so that students can achieve the objectives that will help them reach the goals of the course. the process of materials development involves deciding how to put your teaching principles into practice.

Adapting a Textbook

There is the difference between writing a textbook and teaching from a textbook. Once textbook is written, it is fixed, whereas when you teach with it, you can make changes in how you use it. We need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of textbooks for minimizing disadvantages. There are two facets to understanding how to use a textbook. The first facet, getting inside the textbook, is important so that you know what you are adapting or supplementing. The second facet helps you to be clear about what you are adapting it to.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Assignment#8 Evaluation of Curriculum


























This text book is designed for college student's practical English communication.
This text book is not intended to be comprehensive course in English.
The primary goal fo the book is to create a base of interesting and useful activities for communicative language teaching.
The book provides variety of stretagies which is dialogue, asking questions, pronunciation, and discussion questionsto achive the curricular goals that is English speaking proficiency.
Many activities being provided in pair and group.
The text book also contains the traditional for skills reading, writing, listening, speaking in each chapter fo this book.
This is because research shows that language acquistion is most effective when the four skills are developed in conjunction with each other. But the content of reading and grammar is not as well organized as the content of speaking.
The level of vacabulary and dialogue expression is comparatively low for collegue students.
Especially for advenced students.
Support materials are not sufficent to meet each level of studnets.

I found out the similarities between yellow rubric and my rubric:
1. Obfectives and goals is clear for the curriculum and appropriate for student's needs.
2. The lesson provide the opportunity for students to be active participants in the instrution, engaging them in listening, reading , speaking and writing in English.
3. A variety of resources are available to access all students.
4. Instruction is organized around goals that are tied to ESL/ELD standards and the core curriculum.

I found out the diffrences:
My rubric tends to be less general and not specifically stated campare to yellow rubric.
For instance, as for assessment, yellow rubric has more general criteria which is resources, progressing, priorites and modifying.
But mine is limited and vague criteria provided.
Each category needs to be more evaluated in general and specific manner.

I'd recommend this text book for pre-intermidiate college students sho focus on their speaking proficienty, not reading or grammar proficiency.
If suppor materials provided to meet each revel of students the text book would be more available to assess all studnets.

Revised Course Evaluation Rubric


Friday, December 3, 2010

Graves ch#5 reading reflection

According to what Dylan Bate said "there are many worth and precious things that can be done" so if we don't state goals we can be easily distracted from what we need to assess.
"Stating goals helps to bring into our vision and priorites for the course"
Even thoug we state explicit goals if objectives are not appropriate the goals won't be achieved.
"Objectives are statements about how the goals will be achieved"
"The objective must relate to the goal"
I had a goal for my English proficiency in speaking and I set up most time spent on reading grammar book.
Reading grammar book was helpful a certain point but it did not achive my goal which is to improve ability to speaking in English.
Because my my objective did not identify expected outcome.
If the goal is not achieved throught the objective, the objective may need to be examined and changed or refined so that the goal can be reached.

Course Evaluation rubric


Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Module#6. Evaluation rubric rough draft

Evaluation Rubric Design – rough draft.

Even though rubrics are hard and time-consuming to design, but rubrics are definitely needed with assessments to assess the performance of students effectively.
Rubrics are scoring guides that teachers and children use to assess achievement on particular writing projects.
Rubrics are used for more reasons as well, which are that make instructor’s expectations clear to the student, show students how to meet the instructor’s expectations, help students evaluate the quality of their own work, and identify the specific elements an instructor uses to differentiate between the qualities of performances.

Rubrics apply elements of primary trait scoring to simplify the assessment and grading of children’s writing.
Rubrics can have 3,4,5 or 6 levels, with descriptors at each level. In most rubrics, the descriptors are related to ideas, organization, language, and mechanics, but they vary to fit the writing project.

Rubrics typically consist of task, criteria, range of performance.

Task: Writing friendly letters to develop relationships with audiences.
Criteria: organization, vocabulary, word choice, sentence, mechanics.
Range of performance:
-Exceptional Writer(14-16pts)
-Developing Writer(11-13pts)
-Beginning Writer(8-10pts)
-Emergent Writer(0-7pts)

Holistic Or Analytic—Which To Use?

HOLISTIC—views product or performance as a whole; describes characteristics of different levels of performance. Criteria are summarized for each score level.
(Holistic Example)
Friendly Letters
Exceptional Writer.(4)
-Organized structure.
-Essentially free of mechanical errors
-Essentially free of punctuation error.
-Clear and appropriate for audience.

Analytic-Separate facets of performance are defined, independently valued, and scored.
Analytic—pros and cons
-Sharper focus on target
-Specific feedback (matrix)
-Instructional emphasis
(Analytic Example)
Exceptional Writer.(4)
Letter has correct form
Number of paragraphs
Envelope included and correct format

There is steps in developing a rubric.
1.Design backwards-rubric first; then product/performance.
2.Decide on the criteria for the product or performance to be assessed.
3. Write a definition or make a list of concrete descriptors-identifiable-for each criterion.
4.Develop a continuum for describing the range of performance for each criterion.
5. Keep track of strengths and weaknesses of rubric as you use it to assess student work.
6. Revise accordingly.
7. Step back; ask yourself “ What didn’t I make clear instructionally? The weakness may not be the rubric.

There is the task of creating a grading rubric of 6 steps
1 ,Record the performance objective
2. Identify the dimensions/tasks comprising the performance
3. Identify the postential gradations of quality
4. Assign a point value to each gradations of quality
5. Identify the criteria for each gradation, and a total point value for the assessment.
6. Create the rubrictable.

The best rubrics are below
1. Analytic and holistic
2. Developmental
3. Generalizable and specific
4. Instructional

Reference
Rubric.ppt
Tompkins, G. (2008). Teaching writing balancing process and product. Library of congress cataloging in publication data, 86-91.
www. School.discoveryeducation.com.

Friday, November 19, 2010

Module #5 Annotated Bibliography

Annotated Bibliography

Language Learning and Culture in EFL Secondary School
(SooHyun Kim, JuHyun Lee, Kyoungchun Kim)

Citation 1:
Grau, M. (2009). Worlds apart? English in German youth cultures and in educational settings. World language,28(2), 160-174.

Summary:
This study focuses on German teenagers and their contact with English in two different contexts: in free-time activities typically involving the mass media, and in institutionalized language learning settings at school. The first objective of the study was to find out more about teenagers’ contacts with English in their free time, especially concerning TV, music, computer games, internet, and travel. This was the starting point for the second aim, which explored aspects of the English language classroom and especially the relevance of the students’ out-of-school language exposure to the institutionalized learning environment.

This paper sets out to explore the needs of a specific group of language users. An interesting feature about this group is their exposure to English from a number of different Sources. With their compulsory English lessons in school on the one hand and a variety of free-time activities on the other, often including exposure to media such as TV, the radio, and the internet, teenagers in Germany today have a more varied and unique contact with their target language than past generations. Another focus lies on the teachers' perceptions of their students' contact with English outside school and on their practice in the classroom as to whether and how they use this experience in class. The data suggests that out-of-class contact with English is often not integrated into the EFL classroom. Thus, the classroom and the students' free time seem to be, by and large, two separate spheres, involving different methods of exposure to English in terms of text types, topics, activities, and language varieties

Review:
According to the article, the main aim of the enquiry was to find out how teenagers experience learning English in school in the light of their exposure to the language in their free time. The article compares the role of the English language in the teenagers in free time and in school. The article also shows us the potential influence of the interaction with the English language outside school on the classroom. We can see how teenager use and improve English in their free time especially concerning TV, music, computer games, internet, and travel, and how out-of-class English learning effects and motivate into a class through the article.

Citation 2:
Ghahremani-Ghajar, S., Mirhosseini, S. A. (2005). English class or speaking about everything class? Dialogue journal writing as a critical EFL literacy practice in an Iranian high school. Language, Culture & Curriculum, 18(3), 286-298

Summary:
In ‘critical language pedagogy’ (Brown, 1997; Reagan & Osborn, 2002), learners must also have the opportunity to think about what to communicate, then, pursues the joint goals of developing communicative language abilities and simultaneously applying this ability to developing a critical understanding and awareness of the world . By applying critical language pedagogy to foreign language teaching, learners are not only given the chance to learn the foreign language in context and to use it in authentic situations, but also they are given the opportunity to do more than language learning, to think and act as critically conscious beings (Graman, 1988).

This study was an effort to explore the contribution of DJW to critical pedagogical values in language education, empowerment in particular. This qualitative study, employing an ethnographic research method, investigates how dialogue journal writing, which allows teachers and learners to engage in `written conversation', may provide an opportunity to bring critical pedagogy and foreign language education together in a productive way in the context of a critical literacy practice. The investigation has been made to see how dialogue journal writing may contribute to the Empowerment of high school learners of English as a foreign language? Second, how may writing dialogue journals help learners move beyond descriptive uncritical writing and towards critical self-reflective writing? The data consisted of informal written interviews and more than 600 journal entries written by 30 16-year-old high school students in Tehran.

The results were qualitatively analyzed in search of themes relevant to empowerment as a critical educational value and critical writing as a critical literacy practice. The study revealed that writing dialogue journals as a language education activity in EFL pedagogy may empower learners and provide them with opportunities to express their `voice'. It further revealed that dialogue journal writing led to gains in critical self-reflective EEL writing ability.

Review:
The present study examined the role of dialogue journaling in Iranian students’ critical English writing development. The examination has been made to show us how much dialogue journal writing has related with critical writing and how much they affect each other. As for the practice to writing journals develop the patterns of change from uncritical writing to critical self-reflection writing, and week of their voice to express their strong voice.



Citation 3:
Castro, P., Sercu, L. & Méndez García, M. C. (2004). Integrating language-and-culture teaching: an investigation of Spanish teachers' perceptions of the objectives of foreign language education. Intercultural Education, 15(1), 91-104.

Summary:
This article reports on an investigation among Spanish secondary school EFL teachers, focusing on the extent to which teachers support the new culture-and-language teaching objectives. The study’s research questions were about Spanish teachers’ perceptions regarding the objectives of foreign language education, Spanish teachers’ perceptions regarding culture teaching objectives, and distribution of teaching time over language teaching and culture teaching. The results of this research illustrate that teachers are eager to support the new objectives, but they face conflicts when they have to prioritize language teaching and culture teaching objectives.

The intercultural aspect in foreign language education has recently become a particular interest for foreign language teachers. Teachers are now expected to educate the foreign linguistic code, and to contextualize that code against the sociocultural background related with the foreign language and to encourage the acquisition of intercultural communicative competence. The success of that innovation depends on teachers’ perceptions of the innovation.

The main results of the study about teachers’ perceptions are as follows. Firstly, the way teachers recognize the objectives of foreign language education is reflected in the amount of time they spend on language and culture teaching. Secondly, the way teachers were taught as students influences how they approach teaching. That is, teachers’ recent perceptions of priorities in foreign language education mirror the approach to teaching which the teachers experienced themselves as students of foreign languages. Finally, teachers may confront conflicting beliefs, another finding that has arisen from research of teachers’ beliefs.

Review:
According to this article, teachers’ perceptions of the objectives of foreign language education are influential in language-and-culture education and Spanish foreign language teachers prioritize language teaching objectives over culture teaching objectives. However, they are eager to try and achieve culture learning objectives in foreign language education. Since teachers are inclined to interculturalize foreign language education, teacher training programs can build on this willingness, demonstrate to teachers how they can advance and help them to enhance their confidence to teach intercultural competence, and thus prepare their students for life in today’s multicultural and globalized world.

Citation 4:
Wang, W., Xuesong, G (2008). English language education in China: A review of selected research. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 29(5), 380-389.

Summary:
This paper reviews the result of research on English language education in China published in 24 international journals from 2001 to 2006. It describes the nature of this collection of research in detail. The review covers research under six categories; General context of ELT in China, English used in China, language policy and planning, curriculum implementation, learners’ experiences and the professional development of English teachers in China.

The paper also identifies the gaps that future research needs to address, such as the dynamic nature of the Chinese culture of learning, the recognition of Chinese English as a variety of English. It shows teaching and learning in settings including non-elite colleges, secondary and primary schools, and schools for ethnic minorities, too. It has reference to relevant literature, aiming to establish the trend of research on English language education in China and suggests for future research.

Review:
According to this article, culture is an important source of influences on Chinese learners and teachers and nature and extent of cultural influences on learning need to be explored in great depth. The findings on the culture of learning in China need to be interpreted in a context of rapid social changes in China. This article indicates that more systematic research is needed to make any substantial claims relating to China’s own variety of English. In the area of language policy and planning, classroom practices are the key to the implementation of language policy and curriculum and there needs to be more practical research into local responses or adaptation practices of national policies and curricula.

This research has weakness that it is defined by a certain group of elite students with no regard to their ethnic origins, therefore, the finding are not readily applicable to the understanding of the enormous challenges and difficulties facing thousands of Chinese ethnic and linguistic minority students in learning English. As a result, more research efforts are required urgently.

Citation 5:
Savignon, J., Sisoyev, V. (2002). Sociocultural strategies for a dialogue of cultures. Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 508-524.

Summary:
There is often a lack of learner opportunity for out-of-classroom interaction in school foreign language programs. This lack of opportunity puts learners at serious disadvantage when faced with the inevitable psychological, linguistic, and sociocultural obstacles in second language communication. This article reports the findings of a study that attempted to operationalize the concept of sociocultural competence for classroom learners and explore the benefit to learners of explicit training in strategies for coping with certain social and cultural situations.

The goal of the study was to encourage learners’ sociocultural competence with a view to preparing them for a dialogue of cultures which is essential to intercultural communication. This report includes 3 sections: (a) a taxonomy of sociocultural strategies, (b) the description of a method of explicit strategy training developed for use in a Russian high school English as a foreign language (EFL) program, and (c) the outcome of an experimental program in explicit instruction in sociocultural strategies with a class of 11th grade EFL learners.

Review:
This article shows that the explicit teaching of sociocultural strategies in a communication-based foreign language program proved successful in several aspects. Since the real L2 communication and interaction with representatives of L2 cultures may be a worrisome for many foreign language students, they seem to get benefit from strategy training. It has concluded that L2 learners can be prepared for a dialogue of cultures through the explicit teaching of sociocultural strategies.

The taxonomy of sociocultural strategies included two types: (a) strategies for establishing and maintaining intercultural contact, and (b) strategies for creating sociocultural portraits of a L2 context and the participations in intercultural communication. There are three stages in a method of explicit training in the use of such strategies- (a) explanation, (b) exploration, and (c) expression. According to this article, explicit strategy training can play a significant role of a L2 curriculum in preparing learners for intercultural communication in a dialogue of cultures

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Teacher curriculum interview

Interview Questions

1. Please Introduce yourself briefly and tell us of your strengths as an elementary teacher?

2. What do you consider first when you make a lesson plan? Tell us the parts that you take into account when lesson-planning?

3. There are about 36 students in a regular class. How will you teach students in order to improve their communication ability?

4. Among the materials that you can use during the class, what kind of material do you prefer and do you use mainly?

5. If you are to introduce a part of an American culture to your students, what would you select and how would you teach?

6. Here in Korea, you have been co-teaching with another teachers. What do you think is the most important thing in team teaching?

7. You're co-teaching with a Korean teacher. How have you been dealing with any disagreements that came up?

8. As a foreing language assistant teacher, what do you think your roles are during the class and outside of class?

I conducted the interview with Soo parra who has been teaching English in Korea since 2009.
She has 12years teaching experiences in the US, UK, and Korea.
I could learn a lot of valuable things that she experienced and obtained in her 12years of teaching experience during the interview.
All the answers she had as taking modality into lesson plan, having interaction between students and teacher and how to collaborate with other teachers, etc were worth it.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

reading reflection

Why is it so important to define the context and articulating beliefs what we have?

I was unsure about the concept of defining the context and articulating beliefs due to my lack of teaching experience.
Even I have not been clear enough what my target teaching level should be so far.
I have not taken it seriously because I though it may not be such an important matter.etting
But what I got impressed mostly by the text book was getting information about the context such as the needs of student , demands from the school ,teaching resources and physical setting
is the basic fator of design a structure.
Without that information it is difficult to evaluate the appropriateness or effectiveness of the produce.
The illustrations of teachers who are in diffrent context made it more clear that the constraints and resources help us to make all the decision relating to content and goals, organization, materials and assessment.
Especially, the case of Iranian teacher who is faced with esxplicit constraints showed me the more information we have about context the more we will be to make decision and to plan an
effective course.
How is it possible to have appropriate and effective course if I even do not know what my target teaching level is.
I would know what I teach, how I teach as explict as I aware about the context.

I should also know about my beliefs about teaching and learning along with defining context.
Beliefs help us make key decisions about the content and organization of our course.
I found out myself do not know what I believe about my course.
When I looked back my past learning experience according to what text book said that in order to understand where bdliefs come from we need to look at our past experience.
I realized that I may have a beliefs about liberating education .
Becase I has been recalled teacher- center class, as teacher transmit, student just listen to by past experience.
I could not be engaged and motivated in that sense.
The way my beliefs would influence the coure to be student-center class where the students are motivated.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

introduction

Hello everyone!!!

My name is Soo Hyun Kim. I comleted my B.A dgree in Chinese in city of Busan in 2004.
I do not have any teaching experience differ from most of you. so I am not sure what my target teaching level is. please give me your advice and guidance how it differs from kindergarten level to adult level. it will really help me to make a decision for target teaching level.^^
I experienced many curriculums of learning other language such as writing, listening, reading, speaking curriculums as a learner of Chinese at my university.
I am not a technical person , so I dont use many applications on my phone. what I used applications are CACAO TALK for chatting with my friends and watching television on my mobile.
I usually use my moblie as a electronic dictionary. my mobile has a dictionary function, so whenever I fine out new vocabulary I use my mobile to learn and save it.
I expect to learn basic facts about TESOL program and designing language in general.